Tag: scaffolding learning

Posted in Algebra, Math videos

Teaching Math with Mr Khan’s Videos – Variation

Posted on by

I’ve yet to read a math educator’s blog that endorses Khan Academy materials. Well, this blog does. Yes, you read it right. This blog endorses Mr. Khan’s materials for teaching mathematics. No, not by simply viewing the video but using the Mr Khan’s lecture as the object of investigation. Let’s take the video on direct variation. In the video, Mr Khan started with “varies directly” like it’s the simplest thing in the world to understand. Mr Khan then gave the sample problem and solved it as shown in the image below. Mr. Khan’s method is deductive and he uses lecture method. Click here to  view the video in YouTube then read on below to see how the same video can be used to develop the concept of direct variation with conceptual understanding by linking it to students previously learned knowledge about proportion and then as context to introduce or review the concept of function.

How to use Mr Khan’s videos in teaching math
  1. Show the video. It’s a short one so it will be over before your class will realise it’s math.
  2. Ask the class if they can solve the same problem without using Mr Khan’s solution. The problem is elementary school level so students can solve it using arithmetic. Since a gallon of gas costs 2.25 so all they need to do is to find how many 2.25 in 18. They can continue to add 2.25 until they get to 18; continue taking away 2.25 from 18; or just divide 18 by 2.25.
  3. Ask for another solution. Didn’t they do ratio and proportion in 5th/6th grade? So, with a little scaffolding, students can set up 1:2.25 = n:18. I’m not a fan of product of the means is equal to the product of the extremes since it has nothing to do with proportional reasoning but I’ll allow it this time.
  4. Ask for another solution. Again with a little scaffolding questions like “If 1 gallon costs 2.25, how much would 2 gallons cost? 3 gallons? Can you organise those data in tables? It’s important that at 4 gallons you asked the students to solve the problem. There’s no need to continue all the way to 18$. Asking students to predict will make them consider the relationship between pairs of values. This is an important habit of thinking and it is crucial to appreciating and understanding algebra. 
  5. Ask for another solution. With a little scaffolding again like “What do you notice about the values in the table? Can you imagine the arrangement of the points if you plot the values on the Cartesian plane? How will you use the graph to solve the problem?” Again there’s no need to plot the points all the way to 18. Students should think of extending the line to make the prediction. 
  6. Now, go back to Mr Khan. “Study Mr Khan’s solution. What are those x and y that he’s talking about? What does y = kx mean in relation to your graph? Where is it in your table? Anyone can explain what Mr Khan mean by varies directly?”
  7. Assessment/ Assignment/ Further discussion: “The following are questions other students posted in Mr. Khan’s direct variation video in YouTube. How would you answer them?”
    • Sorry if this question seems basic, but I don’t understand how this example relates to functions…could someone please explain? Thanks!
    • What is K in general?
    • Why do we always have to set x?
    • The practice for this video includes inverse variations, which are not yet covered. It would be great if there was practice specifically for direct variation only. Thanks!

George Polya on thinking

This style of teaching is called teaching math through problem solving. If you enjoyed  Teaching Math with Mr Khan, don’t forget to subscribe to this site. I will try to develop more lessons where I will be co-teaching math with Mr Khan’s videos.

Posted in GeoGebra worksheets, Geometry

How to scaffold problem solving in geometry

Posted on by

Scaffolding is a metaphor for describing a type of facilitating a teacher does to support students’ own making sense of things. It is usually in the form of questions or additional information. In scaffolding learning, we should be careful not to reduce the learning by rote. In the case of problem solving for example, the scaffolds provided should not reduce the problem solving activity into one where students follow procedures disguised as scaffolds. So how much scaffolding should we provide? Where do we stop? Let us consider this problem:

ABCD is a square. E is the midpoint of CD. AE intersects the diagonal BD at F.

  1. List down the polygons formed by segments BD and AE in the square.
  2. How many percent of the area of square ABCD is the area of each of the polygons formed?

Students will have no problem with #1. In #2, I’m sure majority if not all will be able to compare the area of triangles ABD, BCD, AED and quadrilateral ABCE to the area of the square. The tough portion is the area of the other polygons – ABF, AFD, FED, and BCEF.

In a problem solving lesson, it is important to allow the learners to do as much as they can on their own first, and then to intervene and provide assistance only when it is needed. In problems involving geometry, the students difficulty is in visualizing the relationships among shapes. So the scaffolding should be in helping students to visualize the shapes (I actually included #1 as initial help already) but we should never tell the students the relationships among the geometric figures. I created a GeoGebra worksheet to show the possible scaffolding that can be provided so students can answer question #2. Click here to to take you to the GeoGebra worksheet.

 

Extension of the problem: What if E is 1/4 of its way from C to D? How many percent of the square will be the area of the three triangles and the quadrilateral? How about 1/3? 2/3? Can it be generalized?

Please share with other teachers. I will appreciate feedback so I can improve the activity. Thank you.

More Geometry Problems:

  1. The Humongous Book of Geometry Problems: Translated for People Who Don’t Speak Math
  2. Challenging Problems in Geometry

 

Posted in Elementary School Math, Number Sense

How to scaffold algebraic thinking in teaching integers

Posted on by

One way to make algebra make sense to students is to show where those mathematics objects (e.g. algebraic expressions/equations/formula) come from. It will even makes sense more to students if they themselves can generate those objects. As John Mason puts it,

The mechanics of algebra (algebraic manipulation) are concerned with studying the effects of combining, undoing and otherwise relating expressions. These make little or no sense unless learners have themselves gained facility in generating expressions so that they know how they arise.  – from Actions and Objects by John Mason.

Generating expressions helps develop algebraic thinking. There are many ways of of embedding this in your teaching. For example with equations, you can ask the students to find as many equations given a solution. Read the post on how to teach the properties of equality on how this can be done. My post about teaching algebraic expressions also shows an example of a task that generates several equivalent algebraic expressions from the same problem situation. Generating formulas by deriving it from other expressions can also be a good activity.  Examples of these is deriving the formula of the area of the triangle from parallelogram/ rectangle and then from these deriving the area of trapezoids. These type of activities help develop students algebraic thinking skills.

Now, how can we do this generating expressions in earlier grades? Let me describe a lesson I taught to a class of year 6 students. This lesson is a continuation of the lesson on teaching integers via the number line with a twist. In that lesson, instead of asking student to arrange numbers, I asked them to arrange number expressions. From there we were able to extend the numbers they know (whole numbers) to now include the negative numbers. The main aim of that lesson is to extend the students’ concept image of negative number from a number that can be used to represent situation (see post on a problem solving approach for introducing integers) to a number that results when you take away a bigger number from a smaller number.

In this lesson with negative numbers, zero, and positive numbers on the number line, I can now proceed to defining integers or perhaps compare integers. But what will the students learn from that except that they are called integers? If I ask them to compare the numbers what good is that at this point? Where will they use that knowledge? So the task that I gave  them in this lesson was to make as many number expressions whose answer corresponds to the numbers in the number line. Note that this task is an open-ended problem solving task. Below is a sample student solution.

When I asked the class to share their answers I was surprised that they did not restrict themselves to addition and subtraction operation.

With the data shown on the board (pardon my handwriting) I asked them to make some observations and generalizations. They gave the following:

1. It is easy to make number expressions when the answer should be positive.

2. You always get a negative if you subtract a bigger number from a smaller number.

3. You always get a zero if you subtract equal numbers. (If you think this knowledge easily transfer to negatives, you’re wrong. I did try my luck when I asked them “is it also true to -7 – (-7)?”. I got blank stares. Clearly the expression it is still beyond them.

If these are not powerful mathematics to you especially #2 and well, #3, I don’t know what they are. Anyway, the point of my story here is that it is good practice to ask students to generate expressions. It is like asking them to think of a problem given the solution, a highly recommended  mathematics teaching practice.

Posted in Algebra

Teaching the properties of equality through problem solving

Posted on by

problem solvingI like to teach mathematical concepts via problem solving. It right away engages students mind. It creates a need for learning a more systematic way of doing things and hence a reason for learning the concept. It provides a context for making connections. Most important of all, it gives students opportunity to learn before they are taught.

One of the ways of creating a problem solving task for this kind of lesson is to start by giving the solution/answer.  For example, a standard textbook task is to solve for x in an equation.  Why not do it the other way and ask students to find the equation given the solution?

Here is my favorite problem for introducing the properties of equality:

Write three equations in x with solution x = 5.

Fresh from their elementary school math experience of solving equation of the type  15 – ___ = 20 or x + 12.3 = 20, students will generate equations by trial and adjust. That is, they think of an equation then check if it gives x = 5 by substituting the value of x to the equation.  It will not take long for them to realize that this is something very tedious.

Other students will verify their equations by expressing the terms into equivalent structure. I explained this method in my previous post. This method is not also very efficient for some equations. But students have to experience these so that they will be able to appreciate the efficiency of solving equations using the properties of equality.

Usually when they already have at least two equations I will extend the task to:

Two of the equations should have x on both sides of the equal sign .

Challenge them further to think of a more systematic way for making the equations. You will not hear the bell ring before students will realize that all they need to do to have an x on both sides is to add or subtract x on both sides of the equal sign! (Multiplying or dividing by x is a different matter as there is a possibility that x can be zero). Now they know that those ubiquitous equations in their algebra textbooks did not just drop from they sky. They can even create one themselves. The students are applying the properties of equality before they even know what they are! Speaking of constructivist teaching here.

Teachers I shared this with were also very happy because they no longer have to do trial and adjust when they make exercises for solving equations.