Posted in What is mathematics

Can having fun and learning math coexist?

I wrote a little post titled Mathematics is not easy  to challenge the teachers I work with to rethink the way they teach mathematics. I  shared the post in LinkedIn and it generated intelligent discussions and ideas about mathematics and teaching mathematics from the community Math, Math Education, Math Culture. I think we can learn a lot from the well-thought of comments and reactions from the community. There are so far 224 comments. Let me share the comments and reactions related to the existence of ‘fun’ in mathematics. Before you read the comments and reactions, I suggest you first read the post Math is not easy.

  1. Certainly not a waste of time. Making it fun and easy has great benefits, such as increased love for math overall, stronger levels of confidence, and an encouragement toward number sense – Steve Kleinrichert
  2. So are you suggesting that we just tell our students on day one that “this is not going to be a fun class. This material is going to be difficult and you probably won’t understand it!”…..
    And what is your “fact” based on? “Math is not an easy subject”… With proper techniques & approaches, math can be as easy as any other subject. And “… not easy to learn it” depends on the student, teacher & learning goals.
    Also, if you are suggesting that teachers accept the “fact”, how will that make it better for anyone, students or teachers? – Scott Taylor.
  3. There’s a big difference between making math fun by putting in external wastes of time that obscure the math, and making it fun *because* of the mathematics and the interesting problems within. I agree that we shouldn’t do the former, which I think is what Erlina is saying. But we should try to choose problems that are fun and engaging through their mathematical content. – Daniel Zaharopol.
  4. So much mathematics can be learnt through a playful interaction with the problem. In fact, we often colour our students perception of what we expect by using words like problem when puzzle or dilemma would be just as suitable. A sense of fun is, in my experience, essential as it prevents students from giving up and writing off the ability that they have already. – Mike Chittenden
  5. Making mathematics easy is the goal of every diligent math teacher. Like perfection, the ideal may be unattainable but the pursuit is worthy. – Charles Ashbacher
  6. I also disagree with you. If teachers stopped trying to make math fun I think math would get even more boring. There is so much beauty and mystery. I asked my students what they thought math was and they gave some very interesting answers. Since I am teaching in China none of my students said stupid or not fun. There is fun to be had and interesting things to talk about. – Dominique Lomax
  7. My mathematics teachers did not try to make mathematics fun, yet I found that mathematics is interesting in itself. – Ng Foo Keong (Sophus)
  8. Math and any other subject can be difficult / boring / not fun depending on our (teachers) goals. I have never pretended that I educate new generation of mathematicians. My goal is to develop the way of mathematical thinking through delivering strong basis of mathematical concepts. Can it be fun? Maybe. Is it difficult? For whom: teachers or students? It depends on…. Lots of parameters. – Bess Ostrovsky

More related insights in The fun in learning mathematics is in the challenge.

Posted in Lesson Study, Mathematics education

How to facilitate a lesson study group

The long term goal of lesson study as a professional development model is to enhance teachers’ content and pedagogical content knowledge and develop their capacities for designing and studying (researching) their own lessons. The expected output of a Lesson Study group is to develop a curriculum material in the form of a lesson plan. The process of developing the plan becomes a context for teachers to gain insights about how students think and learn the topic chosen and the discipline in general.

In my earlier  post about Lesson Study I described what Lesson Study is and the Collaborative Lesson Research and Development project of UP NISMED about Lesson Study to find out if it will work in Philippines given its school realities. In this post I will describe my experience in facilitating a lesson study group of mathematics teachers all teaching Intermediate Algebra (Year 8 math). Our CLRD project introduces the first lesson study in their school.  The discussion below shows how I “scaffolded” teachers learning of the LS process through a series of questions.

Like any project, Lesson Study starts with a goal.

1. Goal setting:

Although I wanted teachers to try the strategy Teaching through Problem Solving (TtPS), I didn’t want to impose it on them. So during the first meeting to identify the goal for our lesson study, I started with the following questions:

  1. What are some of the problems do you encounter in your mathematics class?
  2. What are some of your teaching problems in mathematics?
  3. What are some of your students learning difficulties in mathematics?
  4. What are some of the things you wish your students can do in your mathematics class?

My first question was too general.  Identified concerns were about lack of textbooks, materials, absenteeism, students’ personal problems, lack of motivation, etc. These are problems that lesson study cannot solve except perhaps the problem on motivation. The second question was equally disastrous. I received a blank look. They don’t have teaching problems. It’s the students who have problems. Hence the third question. The students’ problem is that they are not learning their mathematics. This wasn’t very helpful. It’s too general for the purpose of lesson study. So I asked the fourth question. And Voila. The teachers said they wish their students could think! This was my cue. So I said, “that’s great, let’s put our heads together and design a lesson that would engage students in thinking and reasoning”.

2. Selecting the topic:

My questions:

  1. What topic would you like to make a lesson about?
  2. What are the important ideas and skills should students learn about in this topic?
  3. What about mathematics will students learn from this lesson?
  4. Why should students learn this topic? Can we just skip this lesson?

The first question was received with excitement. Everybody was talking. It only took a couple of minutes for them to agree on one topic. However, when I asked why they like the topic they said that it’s because they already have activities for it and students find learning the topic easy. While there isn’t anything wrong with this one I encouraged them to think of a topic that the students find difficult to understand or that which teachers find difficult to teach. I explained that there will be about 5 to 7 heads that will work on the plan so they might as well take advantage of it and select a topic that they find problematic and solve it together. And they did.

Questions for selecting teaching approach/strategy

  1. What kind of mathematical task will make students think?
  2. When do you give problem solving tasks and how do you get your students to do problem solving?
  3. Would you like to try teaching the unit using a problem that you give at the end? Would you like to try to develop a lesson using TtPS?

I got what I wanted with the first question but there was a “but”.  The group said “of course, it’s problem solving but students don’t like to solve problems”. Hence I asked the second question. As I have expected, problem solving is given at the end of the unit and they admitted that most of the time they skip that part for lack of time. When they do have time, they will solve a sample problem first and then ask students to solve a similar problem to practice the method of solution. So I asked the group “Do you think the students are really thinking here?” They said “a little because they only need to follow the solution”. So when I asked if they would like to try TtPS they said “we could try”. These teachers attended an in-service training with us about TtPS but admitted that they did not use it in their teaching for reasons ranging from lack of resources, time constraint, and that it is hard to make a lesson using one. I said that with 5 to 7 heads working on a plan using TtPS, they just might be able to make one.

3. Designing and Implementing the lesson plan.

Here are the steps they we went through in developing the plan:

  1. We selected a problem found at the end of the unit.
  2. The teachers solved the problem in different ways. I asked them to try solving the problem intuitively and using students previously learned knowledge.
  3. The teachers tried the problem in the class to know students difficulties with it. Decided it needed an introductory activity to help students visualize the situation.
  4. Wrote the teaching plan. Tried it out. Discussed the result. Revised the plan. Implemented it again.

You can tell by the process we went through that lesson study is highly rooted in the principle of social constructivism.

I recommend this book by Catherine Lewis. It’s a valuable resource for conducting your own Lesson Study. I met the author in two separate Lesson Study conferences. She was keynote speaker in 2010 World Association of Lesson/Learning Study and she was also speaker in the APEC Tsukuba Conference V in Japan. She is actively promoting LS in the US.

Posted in Curriculum Reform, Mathematics education

What is Lesson Study?

Studies show that the way to go to implementing effective and sustainable educational reform will be through an inquiry-type professional development program and while the teachers are in action. One of these professional development models that has proven effective in Japan and is now being implemented and widely used in many countries is Lesson Study. It is also one of the identified factors for Japan’s high achievement in TIMSS.

Lesson Study engages teachers in creative and collaborative work in developing and researching a lesson through a “design-tryout-reflect-revise” cycle until it reaches a form to which they believe would be exemplary to them and to other teachers. It assumes that by investigating the teaching and learning process in the context of designing and implementing a lesson, it could provide teachers with experiences that has the potential to deepen their content knowledge and their knowledge about how students learn concepts and skills, develop teachers skills in designing and facilitating lessons, and most importantly develop the skills, habit and confidence in investigating their own lessons.

In the Philippines, the first Lesson Study project was implemented in 2006 by UP NISMED with selected mathematics classes. The project was called Collaborative Lesson Research and Development (CLRD) to give emphasis on the collaborative nature of designing and researching the lesson, something that is not yet a popular practice among teachers in our country. The objectives of the project were 1) to equip teachers with skills in designing mathematics lessons that engage student in mathematical thinking processes; 2) to enhance teachers’ knowledge of content and pedagogy as they study how their students think, learn, and reason; 3) to develop a lesson study model that is adaptable to Philippines classroom realities directly affecting teaching and learning of mathematics which include among others large class sizes, inadequate content and pedagogical content knowledge of teachers and insufficient materials and resources; and, 4) to gain insights about how teachers implement reform-based teaching strategies in their classes. The unique feature of this lesson study project in the Philippines is the focus on developing teachers capacity in designing lesson and teaching mathematics through problem solving, something that is also not yet a common practice of teaching mathematics in our classes.

The first step in doing lesson study is to articulate the goals for doing the lesson study. Click the link to read how I facilitated a group of teachers to identify their goals. It was their first time to do a lesson study. I reported the result of this study in the post Lesson Study for Teaching through problem solving.