Jul 292013
 

In solving generalization problems that involve figures and diagrams, I have always found working with the figures—constructing and deconstructing them—to generate the formula more interesting than working with the sequence of numbers directly that is, making a table of values and apply some technique to find the formula. Here’s a sample problem involving counting hexagons.

Problem: When making a cable for a suspension bridge, many strands are assembled into a hexagonal formation and then compacted together. The diagram below illustrates a ‘size 4′ cable made up of 37 strands.

hexagonal cables

‘Size 4′ Cable

How many strands are needed for size 5 cable? How many for size n cable?

Solution 1

counting hexagon

Solution 2

hexagon problem

Solution 3

hexagon pattern

I actually found five algebraic expressions for the relationship between the side of the cable and the number of strands. Each of these shows a different way of looking at the hexagons. I leave this problem to you to discover the corresponding visuals to these two algebraic expressions:

algebraic expressions

You can also find the solution to this problem by finding the formula for the sequence 1, 8, 19, 37, 61, … or creating this function table:

quadratic function

Which of these type of activities—geometric patterns vs number patterns—would you consider pedagogically more powerful? What are the advantages of each?

If you want a copy of Counting Hexagons, click the link to download. A simpler activity involving generating algebraic expression is Counting Smileys.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
This site is my contribution to narrowing the gap between research and practice in mathematics teaching and learning. I share teaching and learning materials and blog about reforms, issues, and teaching practices in mathematics. Support site by sharing it to your network. Contact: mathforteaching@gmail.com

Leave a Reply